By SCOTT GRABER
BEAUFORT TODAY
Last month we learned that Exxon Mobil, Royal Dutch Shell, Chevron and others-- sometimes called ‘Big Oil’-- raked-in $36 billion in profit during the first three months of this year.
Somehow I thought there might be some embarrassment on the part of Big Oil. For some reason I thought there might be some contrition because of the widespread “pain at the pump.”
American Airlines, for example, is parking some of its regional jets and pushing some of its employees into early, involuntary retirement. Ford is shutting down production lines. Long distance truckers are putting second mortgages on their homes in order to top off their fuel-hungry rigs.
Right here in Beaufort County, shrimpers are wondering if they should leave the dock. If they choose to venture into the Sound — and don’t catch any shrimp -- they could find themselves in bankruptcy.
In an effort to better understand this situation I met with my friend Charlie Peyton, who was president of Exxon International between 1972 and 1977. Charlie began by telling me that a big part of the problem is supply.
“There is oil out there but for environmental reasons, it can’t be pumped. We should be drilling in the Artic National Wildlife Refuge.”
Charlie says that if we drilled in the refuge - and just off the Pacific and Atlantic coasts - there would be plenty of “supply.”
Charlie also told me speculators are driving up the cost of a barrel of crude to $135. He said our weak dollar doesn’t buy as much as it used to. He said $36 billion may look like a big number to you but it’s really a small number when compared with our pharmaceutical friends.
The boys over at Big Pharma are making 25.3 cents on every dollar of revenue and cigarette makers are getting 15.7 cents. This compares with 9.8 cents that Big Oil gets from every dollar of revenue.
OK, I guess I understand. But, still, I have a thing about $36 billion in profit when my shrimper friends can’t afford to leave the dock. It doesn’t seem right for one company — actually several oil companies -- to make this much money when many other Americans are in serious trouble.
But I’ve always been a little soft-headed when it comes to capitalism, profit and free enterprise. I’ve always thought economic disparity of this caliber is what started the French and Russian revolutions and the hording of huge wealth by small, champagne-sipping elites is responsible for the on-going unhappiness in Africa.
But enough of these Trotskyite mutterings.
Charlie reminded me of the oil crisis in 1972 when our Arab friends decided to turn off the spigot. He told me in 1972 Americans, for the first time, bought smaller, fuel efficient cars. Unfortunately for Detroit automakers, Americans bought Toyotas, Hondas and their better-built kindred from the Japanese.
Charlie said this crisis could lead us away from our lumbering Tahoes and Tundras back to something smaller — perhaps a hybrid. He said a few people in Beaufort County might actually take the bus. He said Americans might become more conservation minded and, eventually, the price of oil could come down.
In the United States profit — even huge profit — is a pillar of capitalism. We don’t complain when somebody like Bill Gates makes immense, immeasurable profit.
(And, of course, it helps when somebody like Bill Gates appears to be giving that profit back to people in Africa.) But that assumes that the rest of us are healthy and happy and bringing back a modest return on our own labor.
That, Big Oil should discern, is not now the case.
Scott Graber is a long-time Port Royal resident and practices law in Beaufort. He can be reached via e-mail at ssgraber@charter.net
Comments
Liberlism=Socialism
It's really as simple as that. Enviromentalism=Anticapitalism look to Brazil's drilling just off it's pristine coast without so much a tree hugging wimper. Why you ask? Because it was done by the government for the "people" not by the evil corporations. So know that Green Peace don't give a crap about the polar bears in ANWAR thaey just hate EXXON.
I love it when a plan doesn't comes together
I love it when a plan doesn't come together. Analyzing the socialistic ramifications of blaming "big oil" and enlightening the rest of us with your knowledge of history is impressive, and admirable. Defining capitalism by huge profits suggests an underlying motive. Me, I'm just a simple man with a basic understanding of how things work, or for that matter, don't work.
We all, at some point in our lives develop plans. Plans for an education, plans for a family, plans for a home in a place where we want to live, and plans for naming our children to honor our parents. Our government has substituted ambitions for an energy plan. Ambitions are not plans, they are the subsatnce of plans, but they don't encompass enough of the picture and are too centralistic to be a plan.
Blaming an oil company doesn't solve the problem. We are the problem. Until we, the American public, decide that the day of reliance on foreign oil as a basis of our energy policy is over, it will be just that. Seems damn silly to elect people to go to Washington to govern, when the ones controlling our foreign policies and the domestic economy are the ones who control foreign oil and it's price. Unfortunately for the shrimpers, the truckers, the airline employees, and the rest of us............we just haven't gotten to that point yet.
Big Beer
Big Oil makes about 8% profit. Big Beer makes about 10% profit. Big Water makes more than that. You can't fault a company for making money.
Big Beer
I'm just glad W continues to give tax breaks to oil companies as well as billionaires. God forbid they should have to pay taxes like the middle class. That W is a real magician I tell you!!! He's figured out how to start a war, and cut taxes at the same time. This is the first time in history that this has happened. PURE GENIUS!!!! We then sell our massive debt to those Godless communists, the Chinese, and laugh as our dollar plunges in value. That will show them to trust us!!!
About Big Oil...
Mr. Graber, to your credit you acknowledge that you're "soft-headed" about profit, capitalism and free enterprise. ("Soft-headed" being another term for "soft-hearted," I suspect.) Please keep in mind that it's pension funds and investment portfolios that "own" Big Oil. I hope you're not actually supporting the idea of the Windfall Profits Tax? If the government begins to plunder these profits, just when demand is high and supply low, we all lose. We can't expect the oil companies to pay stockholder dividends, swell our personal pension funds AND re-invest in the improved technology needed to tap new oil reserves if they are artificially over-taxed.
Remember, the difference between pre-revolutionary France and Russia and contemporary America is the difference between an aristocracy and a democracy. Do you really want to live in a country where the government can arbitrarily decide how much profit you're allowed to make whenever national economic circumstances shift? When a government starts having that kind of control over our individual pursuits of success, it starts to feel uncomfortably like... an aristocracy.
Big oil
Well written, Hermione and I agree. Add to that is the fact that despite the headline posts from the wailing of the subcommittees, gasoline is only one product of those giant oil companies. They are also well diversified in supplying raw materials such as solvents used in manufacturing industrial products such as plastics. These companies make good profits because they are diversified and well managed. Every mutual fund and investment company holds oil stocks. After all, profits shouldn't be an evil word in a capitalist society.
Congress should remember that these companies could be headquartered in any nation of the world. They had better try to make it attractive to stay in the USA. Oil companies are geese that lay golden eggs.